Web10 de out. de 2024 · In this paper, I focus on the contrast between Donnellan and Strawson. By focusing on this contrast, my aim is, first, to clarify the nature of Donnellan's distinction between referential and attributive uses of definite descriptions and, second, to argue that a proper understanding of referential uses holds the key to a proper understanding of … WebLexical choice and conceptual perspective in the generation of plural referring expressions. Albert Gatt & Kees van Deemter - 2007 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):423-443. Strawson on Referring. C. A. Caton - 1959 - Mind 68:539. Reference and definite referring expressions. Richard Epstein - 1998 - Pragmatics and Cognition 6 ...
Strawson P. F.. On referring. Mind, n.s. vol. 59 (1950), pp. 320–344.
WebStrawson-3 Strawson's criticism: ___ Russell in unquestionably wrong in this, and that sentences which are significant, and which begin with an expression used in the uniquely referring way, fall into neither of these two classes. … WebStrawson's attack on Russell's theory of descriptions is also an attack on Russell's view of proper names and their function as referring signs [1]. In this paper I shall consider both of Strawson's critiques and shall attempt to show that they are mis-leading and unfounded. I shall also attempt to show that Strawson's alternative grain alphabet
Reference and Definite Descriptions - JSTOR
WebSynonyms for REFERRING: alluding, denoting, signifying, indicative, allusive, telltale, reflective, symptomatic, characteristic, denotative WebStrawson is a leading member of the circle of philosophers whose work is sometimes described as "ordinary language philosophy" or as "Oxford philosophy." Of his early work, the most influential and most controversial is the famous article "On Referring" ( Mind, 1950), a criticism of the philosophical aspects of Bertrand Russell's theory of ... WebSTRAWSON ON REFERRING IN his paper " On Referring '',1 P. F. Strawson argues that what Russell gave as an analysis of propositions involving definite descrip-tioxis is actually not part of what is asserted in these propositions, but rather part of what they imply in a special sense of 'imply'. grain ammo