WebIn particular, Mary Tape wanted her daughter to be able to attend Spring Valley public school. When the local school principal stood in the schoolhouse door to bar Mamie’s entrance on the sole grounds that she was Chinese, Mary Tape took her to court. In 1885, almost seventy years before the famous Supreme Court Decision Brown v. WebMary Tape (1857-1934) came to San Francisco from around Shanghai, China in 1868. …

‎1 Sealed Letter: 34. Mary Tape’s Letter to the San Francisco Board ...

WebMary Tape was a desegregation activist who fought for Chinese-Americans' access to … WebIn particular, Mary Tape wanted her daughter to be able to attend Spring Valley public … french former

BOARD OF EDUCATION. — Daily Alta California 16 April 1885 ...

WebMary Tape was a desegregation activist who fought for Chinese-Americans' access to education, notably in the case Tape v. Hurley in 1885,[1][2] in which the Supreme Court of California stated that public schools could not exclude her daughter Mamie Tape for being Chinese-American.[3] WebBetween 1871 and 1885, all public schools were denied access to them. It obliged a historic court case to force the city and state to provide the Chinese residents of the city with schools, although separate ones. A Chinese woman named Mary Tape dressed her 8-year-old daughter, Mamie, in a checkered pinafore, tied a ribbon in her braid In ... WebMary Tape, a Chinese immigrant mother, fought for her daughter, Mamie Tape, to integrate public schools in California. The case, Tape v. Hurley (1885), reached the California Supreme Court in 1885 and, despite a favorable ruling for Tape, the San Francisco Board of Education built a segregated Chinese school which Mamie Tape was forced to attend. french former colonies